One of the many objectives of the New World Order is to turn everything upside down. Convincing people that ugly is beautiful is one mind game that (((they))) play.
Thus, paintings that are chaotic and ugly are glorified by Jewish art critics. Ditto statues. Public buildings, once modeled after ancient Greek architecture, now resemble something from a surreal nightmare.
Fashion also glorifies ugliness, especially women’s high fashion.
Now, this worship of the ugly has made its appearance in beauty pageants.
Excerpts from Return of Kings
Toxic SJW notions of “beauty” (think awful role model and alleged scammer Tess Munster) are well-known. Sadly, it appears that the need to appease certain groups has now filtered down to giving beauty pageant titles to girls based on their race or ethnicity. Two recent “winners” of state-based national beauty pageants, Magnolia Maymuru (Miss World, Northern Territory, Australia) and Arianna Quan (Miss America, Michigan), are so unbelievably plain and even ugly that the “beauty” in beauty pageant should have been removed from the contests they each entered.
In the case of Quan, the biggest criticisms came from her ancestral homeland of China. Chinese netizens need not fear the kind of racism accusations that would be leveled at white Americans questioning whether she deserved the Miss America title for one of America’s most populous states (Miss America’s national event will be in September).
Media coverage of Maymuru’s crowning was ecstatic, namely because, in the words of many racial quota-leaning commenters, “it was about time” that an Aboriginal Australian won such a title. Few online respondents dared to call her unattractive due to the near certainty of them being labeled as racist bigots. She eventually placed in the top 10 for the Miss World Australia final, “beating” much more attractive competition.
Here’s a picture of Miss Michigan Arianna Quan, who became the topic of a Roosh V Forum thread, after her victory:
And here’s another shot of Miss World, Northern Territory Maymuru, whose other photo features as the main image for this article:
All that aside, there comes a point at which certain agendas of the political, racial and ethnic variety try to determine who wins what. Magnolia Maymuru’s “triumph,” for example, resulted in a media that could not contain its delight about someone of a certain race winning a beauty pageant title. With all the fanfare regarding her minority status, it is hard to see how she won on merit. Shouldn’t a win like this speak for itself if it is deserved? In the end, what SJWs say should be treated as a normal thing is actually treated completely very abnormally, as if to justify it. The exact same thing happened with the laudatory coverage of Tess Munster for being “fat and beautiful.”
When real “beautiful women” win pageants, journalists do not usually feel the need to reiterate how dazzling the girl is. Maymuru’s winning of the Miss World, Northern Territory title resulted in tabloid soliloquy after soliloquy. Just in case you did not already know, she’s beautiful! Miss World’s mantra “beauty with a purpose” is meant to soften criticism about the looks of a winning state, national or international entrant, pointing to, say, their charitable or community involvement. But is it a beauty pageant or not? If the answer is yes, attractiveness is the overriding factor.
By far the most offensive example of declaring that which is ugly to be beautiful is the case of First Lady, Michelle Obama. The word “beautiful” has been used to describe her over and over.
The press could be polite and use the noncommittal word “attractive” to describe her. I would not object. But to declare the masculine, misshapen dark creature as beautiful is more than I can take.
A society which glorifies lying is a society that is at war with itself. Truth is beauty. Lies are ugly. Saying that the creatures pictured in this post are beautiful is a lie. Our lies will destroy us as no external enemy ever could.