The recent shootout on this site between the Viking and the men folk resulted in over 100 comments on that one post. It also led me to do some editing of comments, rare for this site, although I’m not sure that all the editing that needed to be done was actually done. I apologize for any shortcomings in my editing.
The tone was becoming ugly and damaging to the overall message that we need to be putting out. It doesn’t look good to new readers unfamiliar with the site when a forum turns into back and forth insults rather than staying focused on issues.
This is a pro-white, anti-feminist, anti-modern culture, anti-immigrant, pro-tradition, pro-Christian culture website. I want everyone who is sympathetic to these positions, male or female, to feel comfortable reading this site and posting comments here. I try to lighten the seriousness of the issues we face by injecting humor, especially humor mocking conventional mainstream thinking. There is anger too, but I characterize it as righteous, justified anger toward the System and toward our enemies.
We should save our anger, disgust, and other negative feelings for them, and not waste it on each other.
After a breathing spell, allowing for emotions rubbed raw to cool down, it’s time for an assessment of differences in the way men and women see things differently.
First, I’m probably the only person here who has read all of Viking’s posts on her site from the beginning. I’ve also left comments on virtually all of them. A few times, my commentary has been critical of an idea she’s expressed, but mostly I’ve supported her. I would say 95 percent of the time. I’ve also supported her on this site, including with this post titled The Best of Viking Bitch.
Here is what I wrote in that post:
I have quite a few women social realists (race, sex, education, and government realists; going against political correctness) scattered among the sites on the blogroll and I’m always looking for more. The women’s perspective, when it’s tempered by realism, adds to the opportunity to strategize resistance to the New World Order agenda. I also have several regular women commenters who bring a realistic perspective on life to this site, but from the distaff point of view.
Viking Bitch offers both wisdom and anger on her blog. I’ve reblogged a number of her posts. Before I started this site, she was kind enough to allow me to write several posts for her site. Thus, I often leave comments on her posts as a form of support.
I’ve expressed support for the Viking’s decision to have children on her own, although I’ve always tempered that support by declaring that the best alternative is the traditional family.
During the shootout I detected that the men are not as tolerant of women’s alternative lifestyles as I am. We are in a war for survival and desperate times call for desperate measures. Thus, I am willing to reluctantly support white women having children without a husband present. Women outnumber men. Not every woman can have a husband.
Twenty years ago, I would not have supported this philosophy, but every time I drive by the local junior high and see all the fourteen-year-old Mexican girls pushing their baby carriages, it reminds me that part of our struggle is a struggle to up our numbers. The other side seeks to see us disappear, which will be the case unless we reproduce.
Throughout history, white tribes have viewed children as an asset to the tribe. We are not like the Aztecs. We didn’t go around sacrificing our children to some imaginary gods, cutting their hearts out and throwing them down a well.
My assessment is, however, that men and women think differently on this issue, with men more strongly preferring the ancient norms of one man, one wife, and the children flow from that structure. In short, men don’t approve of women having children out of wedlock. Women do. Am I wrong?
In a private communication Viking has now insinuated that she does not want me to reblog or leave comments any more on her site. I will honor her wishes, although I hope she changes her mind. She’s a talented writer with great, informative stories to tell, and her thinking about many issues overlaps mine. I will continue to read her writings as I’ve learned a lot from her, including for example, about how white women are harassed by minority men.
Have some respect in the future, guys. Viking could have chosen to acknowledge her white privilege and made her life easier. She could have bought into the diversitard lifestyle and had a high paying job in government. She could have mated with a Jew or other nonwhite male. She did not have to home school her children.
But respect is a two-way street. Viking, I have not been “co-opted” by the Jews. I am not a Jew think kind of guy. I’ve worked hard to cleanse myself of Jew think, although giving myself credit I was never swayed by most of the cultural Marxist bullsh*t to begin with.
My impression is that you don’t intend to comment here again. I hope you change your mind, but whether you do or not, everyone who disagrees with you is not a your enemy.
The kind of deliberate provocation Viking did needed to be answered. I am not going to stop posting articles on white women who deserve the contempt of white men. That would include the women school teachers, feminists, porn stars, and other white women who misbehave. Strong negative commentary by men toward such women does not mean we hate all white women. It means we know that some of you can and should do better.